Court-Ordered Caesarian Sections: In Whose Interests?
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Publication: in whose interests?
s and posters at conferences, results presented at meetings (for example, to inform investigators or participants about findings), results databases (data without interpretation, discussion, context or conclusions in the form of tables and text to describe data/information where this is not easily presented in tabular form) are not considered by Blackwell Publishing to be prior publication. Jou...
متن کاملWhose interests count?
Whose interests should count and how should various interests be balanced at the pediatric patient's bedside? The interests of the child patient clearly count. Recently, however, many authors have argued that the family's interests also count. But how should we think about the interests of others? What does it mean to talk about "the family" in this context? Does it really just mean the interes...
متن کاملBirth injuries in caesarian sections: cases of fracture femur and humerus following caesarian section.
Long bone injuries are less common during caesarian section. Sometimes, they remain unnoticed to the operating surgeon but are frequently noted by attending physician or nurses. The aim of this case study is to remind the surgeon that any forceful extraction may result long bone injuries. So, care should be given during and after delivery to rule out injuries.
متن کاملCaesarian sections in Guadalajara, Mexico: sociodemographic risk factors.
on the population covered by the Mexican Social Security Institute (MSSI). The MSSI offers health services to people with a steady job (for example, industrial and services workers, employees, teachers) and their families and attends about 60% of childbearing in Guadalajara. A probabilistic sample was designed, representative of the first live births (25 662) and their respective mothers. Subje...
متن کاملGeneral practice commissioning: in whose interests?
Clinical commissioning groups (CCGs) in England have awarded hundreds of contracts worth at least £2.4bn (€3.4bn; $3.7bn) to organisations in which their board members have a financial interest, a joint investigation by The BMJ and The Times has found. This new analysis shows the extent to which CCG boards have become conflicted under the health reforms introduced in 2012, which handed general ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: The Modern Law Review
سال: 1993
ISSN: 0026-7961
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2230.1993.tb00961.x